Remote sensing technique | Case study | Instability process type | Type of application | Advantages | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Optical VHR (OOA) | Giampilieri | Shallow soil slides – Debris flows | Landslide mapping | i) great density of spatial information, ii) numerous platforms, iii) high spatial, temporal and spectral resolution, iv) OOA approaches able to delineate areas affected by landslides | i) high cost; ii) on-demand acquisition; iii) cloud cover; iv) acquisition limited to daylight, v) OOA thresholds definition between changed and unchanged areas |
Spaceborne SAR (PSI) | Nebrodi e Peloritani | Complex, rotational and deep-seated landslides | Landslide detection and mapping | i) good cost/benefit ratio, ii) coverage of wide areas; iii) millimeter accuracy; iv) availability of historical archives (since 1992); v) day-night and all weather acquisition. | i) detection of fast movements; ii) monitoring in deferred time; iii) presence of dense vegetation cover; iv) geometric distortions; v) unusable to detect N-S oriented landslides. |
UAV-DP | Ricasoli | Shallow landslides | Landslide characterization and mapping | i) Low cost, rapid survey; ii) high repeatability; iii) high resolution data; iv) avoidance of shadowing effects. | i) Restrictive UAV flight regulations; ii) skilled operator required; iii) negative effect of vegetation on the point cloud. |
TLS - IRT | Elba island | Rock slides | Landslide risk scenario assessment | i) Favorable logistic conditions (up-close survey); ii) Rapid 3D surface, geo-structural and geo-mechanical survey; iii) detailed unstable masses detection-volume calculation. | TLS: i) point cloud resolution related to scenario distance; ii) negative effect of vegetation on the point cloud. IRT: iii) scenario thermal contrasts related to slope orientation-roughness and solar radiation (daily/seasonal variations). |
GB-InSAR - TLS - IRT | San Leo | Rock fall | Landslide long-term monitoring | i) Multi-system approach for wide range of instability process detection and analysis; GB-InSAR: ii) millimeter accuracy; iii) continuous monitoring. iv) day-night and all weather acquisition. | i) Intrinsic limitation of each adopted technique (L.O.S, range of detectable velocity, repetition time). IRT-TLS: ii) only periodical check. GB-InSAR: iii) uncapability for detecting rapid and perpendicular displacements with respect to the L.O.S.; iv) ambiguity in locating displacements for overhanging- slope sectors. |
GB-InSAR | Santa Trada | Translational slide | Landslide Emergency management | i) Rapid installation; ii) day-night and all weather acquisition; iii) early warning and rapid assessment of risk scenario. | i) System loss of coherence, spatial and temporal decorrelation due to vegetation cover; ii) not favorable alignment between system L.O.S. and landslide movement direction (only 15–35% of displacement detected). |