Table 1 Deformation rates of CGPS stations in the Mexico City area (point positioning solution, ITRF-2000 networks). For the location of CGPS stations, see Fig. 2. For geology, see Fig. 3
From: Assessing subsidence of Mexico City from InSAR and LandSat ETM+ with CGPS and SVM
Station | N [mm/year] | E [mm/year] | V [mm/year] | Rock/soil formation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MOCS | 24.1 ∓ 0.7 | −10.3 ∓ 0.6 | −164.7 ∓ 2.8 | Lacustrine |
MPAA | 3.6 ∓ 0.7 | −3.6 ∓ 0.7 | − 220.3 ∓ 2.9 | Lacustrine |
MRRA | −0.6 ∓ 0.8 | −6.7 ∓ 0.7 | −275.3 ∓ 3.5 | Lacustrine |
UCHI | 0.7 ∓ 0.6 | −7.23 ∓ 0.6 | −0.3 ∓ 2.5 | Alluvial (Basalt?) |
UGOL | 0.5 ∓ 0.6 | −8.0 ∓ 0.7 | −0.7 ∓ 2.8 | Alluvial (Basalt?) |
UIGF | −1.5 ∓ 0.6 | −8.0 ∓ 0.7 | −0.7 ∓ 2.8 | Basalt |
UJAL | −1.9 ∓ 0.6 | −7.8 ∓ 0.7 | −3.0 ∓ 2.8 | Basalt |
UPEC | 1.0 ∓ 1.0 | −7.4 ∓ 1.0 | −82.3 ∓ 5.0 | Alluvial (Basalt?) |
UTEO | −2.6 ∓ 0.07 | −6.9 ∓ 0.8 | −2.1 ∓ 3.3 | Lacustrine |