Table 5 Mexico City subsidence monitoring history
From: Assessing subsidence of Mexico City from InSAR and LandSat ETM+ with CGPS and SVM
Researcher(s) | InSAR | GPS | Grace | Maximum rate of subsidence (mm/yr) | Comparison and Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ortiz-Zamora and Ortega-Guerrero (2010) | – | – | – | 400 | Ground magnetic survey and lithologic logs data (1984–1989) |
Ortega-Guerrero et al. (1999) | – | – | – | 400 | Hydraulic, geotechnical, and historical data (1984–1989) |
Chaussard et al. (2014) | X | – | – | 300 | InSAR ALOS data (2007–2011) |
Sowter et al. (2016) | X | – | – | 400 | InSAR Sentinel-1 (2014–2015) |
X | – | X | 250–300 | GRACE and InSAR data sets and SBAS-InSAR algorithm (2007–2011) | |
Cabral-Cano et al. (2008) | X | X | – | 300–370 | InSAR ERS and ENVISAT (1996–2003) |
Strozzi and Wegmüller (1999) | X | – | – | 400 | InSAR ERS satellite data sets (1995–1997) |
Osmanoglu et al. (2011) | X | X | – | 300 | InSAR ENVISAT (2004–2006) and nine CGPS data sets |
Yan et al. (2012) | X | – | – | 350 | InSAR ENVISAT (2002–2007), Gamma-IPTA chain, and SBAS |
Lopez-Quiroz et al. (2009) | X | – | – | 400 | InSAR ENVISAT images (2002 and 2007) |
Current study | X | X | – | 352 | 52 ENVISAT images (2002–2010.5), nine CGPs (1998–2012), and SVM classification |