Skip to main content
Geoenvironmental Disasters
Fig. 5 | Geoenvironmental Disasters

Fig. 5

From: Small-scale analysis to rank municipalities requiring slow-moving landslide risk mitigation measures: the case study of the Calabria region (southern Italy)

Fig. 5

Input data of the proposed method: a sketch of the operative grid with TCUs over the study area; b inventory map of the slow-moving landslides (SMLs) distinguished according to their state of activity (active and dormant); c geo-lithological setting with lithological units (LU) grouped in four classes: LU1 (coarse-grained soils, i.e. sands, sandstones, gravels, conglomerates), LU2 (carbonate rocks, i.e. limestone and dolomites), LU3 (crystalline-metamorphic rocks, i.e. phyllite, schist, gneiss, and granitoids), LU4 (fine-grained soils, i.e. silt, clay, marl); d map of average slope angles (S) distinguished in four classes: S1 ≤ 5°, 5° < S2 ≤ 15°, 15° < S3 ≤ 25°, S4 > 25°; e built-up urban area (UA) map

Back to article page