Table 2 Population density (World Bank 2018), F-values, and slope of F–N curves for various geographical locations
From: A review of landslide acceptable risk and tolerable risk
Locations | Population density/km2 | Slope of F–N curve | F-values | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N = 1 | N = 10 | N = 100 | |||
Japan | 347 | − 0.53 | – | 0.8 | 0.07 |
China | 148 | − 0.61 | – | – | 0.06 |
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil | – | − 3.3 | 1 | 0.52 | 0.0011 |
Italy | 203 | − 1.99 | 0.9 | 0.008 | 0.00005 |
Portugal | 112 | − 2.35 | 0.63 | 0.04 | – |
Hong Kong | 7096 | − 0.79 | 0.6 | 0.01 | – |
Canada | 4 | − 0.92 | 0.4 | 0.07 | – |
Alps | 215 | − 0.538 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.003 |
Nilgiri Hills, India | – | − 0.275 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.006 |
Nepal | 196 | − 1.31 | 0.08 | 0.004 | – |
Colombia | 45 | − 1.63 | 0.04 | 0.001 | – |
Norway | 15 | − 0.72 | 0.006 | 0.001 | – |
Matata, New Zealand | 19 | − 0.73 | 0.0057 | – | – |
A83 Rest and be Thankful site, Scotland | – | − 1.924 | 0.002 | 0.00005 | – |
Taiwan | 637 | − 0.89 | 0.00128 | 0.000157 | – |
Coal Cliff Australia | – | − 2.375 | 0.00125 | 0.0000206 | – |
Guatemala | 153 | – | 0.000134 | – | – |