Skip to main content

Table 1 Selected impact scenarios

From: Empirical formulation for debris flow impact and energy release

ID

L1 (m)

Lm (m)

i ( −)

h (m)

V1 (m3/m)

ν0,1 (m/s)

β (°)

d (m)

L2 (m)

B (m)

b (m)

H (m)

Fr ( −)

H/h ( −)

Impact mechanism*

Expected overtopping^

1

21

15

3

3

45

10

60

3

6.95

11

4

6

1.60

2

Standing jump

Large

2

21

15

3

3

45

20

60

3

6.95

11

4

6

3.19

2

Airborne jet

Large

3

21

15

3

3

45

10

90

3

\(\infty\)

–

–

\(\infty\)

1.84

\(\infty\)

N/D

Nil

4

47

45

43

1

45

10

60

3

6.95

11

4

6

2.76

6

Bore

Moderate

5

21

15

3

3

45

5

60

3

6.95

11

4

6

0.80

2

Dead zone

Nil

6

21

15

3

3

45

15

60

3

6.95

11

4

6

2.40

2

Airborne jet

Large

7

21

15

5

3

63

10

60

3

6.95

11

4

6

1.60

2

Standing jump

Large

8

21

15

3

3

45

10

80

3

6.08

8.5

6.5

6

1.82

2

Standing jump

Large

9

21

15

1

4

48

10

60

3

6.95

11

4

6

1.38

2

Standing jump

Large

  1. *From the study of Faug (2015); ^ from the conceptual scheme in Fig. 1