Skip to main content

Table 8 Results of LightGBM prediction for different training and test data ratios

From: Comparison of factors influencing landslide risk near a forest road in Chungju-si, South Korea

Ratio of train and test data

Precision

Recall

F1-score

Accuracy

AUC

9:1

Train

0

0.95

0.98

0.96

0.96

0.959

1

0.97

0.94

0.96

Test

0

0.67

1.00

0.80

0.78

0.800

1

1.00

0.60

0.75

8:2

Train

0

0.90

0.78

0.84

0.84

0.842

1

0.78

0.911

0.84

Test

0

0.64

0.78

0.70

0.65

0.639

1

0.67

0.50

0.57

7:3

Train

0

0.92

0.83

0.87

0.88

0.880

1

0.85

0.93

0.89

Test

0

0.65

0.69

0.67

0.58

0.544

1

0.44

0.40

0.42

6:4

Train

0

0.89

0.65

0.76

0.78

0.787

1

0.72

0.92

0.81

Test

0

0.79

0.58

0.67

0.68

0.689

1

0.60

0.80

0.69

5:5

Train

0

0.78

0.70

0.74

0.76

0.759

1

0.75

0.82

0.78

Test

0

0.74

0.56

0.64

0.63

0.641

1

0.54

0.72

0.62