The failure of the Stava Valley tailings dams (Northern Italy): numerical analysis of the flow dynamics and rheological properties
 Marina Pirulli^{1}Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
 Monica Barbero^{1},
 Maddalena Marchelli^{1} and
 Claudio Scavia^{1}
Received: 16 October 2016
Accepted: 24 December 2016
Published: 19 January 2017
Abstract
Background
Tailings dams are made up of mining residue deposits, and they represent a high risk, in terms of mechanical instability. In the event of collapse, the tailings in such dams may be released and flow over long distances, with the potential risk of extensive damage to property and life. The traditional geotechnical assessment of tailings facilities has mainly concentrated on the stability of tailings dams, while relatively few studies have investigated the flow of tailings released after dam failure. In this context, it is possible to state that, if the complex rheological behaviour of the tailings material is captured correctly during the flow, numerical modelling can be used to contribute to a better comprehension of the flow characteristics and for the assessment of the possible extension of the impact area.
Results
Considering the wide range of possible rheological behaviour that tailings flows can assume (from laminar to turbulent), this paper presents the new version of a computer model, which was designed to simulate the motion of rapid flow movements across 3D terrain. This new version integrates the existing rheological kernel (Frictional, Voellmy) with two new rheological laws (Bingham and Turbulent), and adds the possibility of changing the rheological properties of the flowing mass during the propagation process. The code has been applied to the disastrous flow that was caused by the failure of a pair of tailings impoundments in the Stava Creek Valley (Italy) in 1985. Since different interpretations on this flow behaviour already exist in literature, and since a large number of changes in the rheological values along the runout path have been proposed to recreate its dynamics, new simulations, carried out with different rheological combinations, are presented and discussed here in order to obtain a better understanding of the flow dynamics and to identify the rheology that reproduces the phenomenon that occurred with the fewest possible changes in the rheological values along the runout path. The latter aspect is particularly important when numerical analyses are used for prediction purposes.
Conclusions
The great rheological flexibility of the new code has allowed the Voellmy rheology and a combination of its parameters to be identified as the most suitable to describe the Stava flow, even where the runout path presented critical characteristics.
Keywords
Tailings dams Numerical modelling Flow dynamics RheologyBackground
Some several thousand million tonnes of mining waste is produced each year. The wastes resulting from the chemical and mechanical processes of mining extraction, called tailings, are mixtures of crushed rock and processing fluids from mills, washeries or concentrators that remain after the extraction of metals, minerals, mineral fuels or coal from the mine resource (Kossoff et al. 2014).
Tailings are often accumulated in upstream/downstream valleys, or in ring impoundments and, in all these cases, are retained by a dam. If, for any reason, the dam wall should break, the accumulated tailings can escape the impoundment, thus giving rise to a flow of material that is characterized by a high energy content, with ensuing serious socioeconomic and environmental consequences.
Guaranteeing the stability of such impoundments is one of the most challenging tasks in mine waste management. These storage basins are in fact particularly vulnerable to failure for the following reasons (Rico et al. 2008a): (1) dams made of locally derived filling material (soil, coarse waste, overburden material from mining operations and tailings); (2) dams subsequently raised as solid material coupled with a severe increase in effluent (plus runoff from precipitation); (3) lack of regulations on specific design criteria; (4) their extremely large area makes punctual criticality identification difficult, and would require an extensive and continuous monitoring, which, apart from the very high costs, is also time consuming, and (5) the high cost of remediation works, following the closure of mining activities.
As a consequence, the mining industry has recently experienced several significant dam failures, with important examples in South Africa (Blight et al. 1981; Van Niekerk and Viljoen 2005); Guyana (Vick 1996); Spain (AyalaCarcedo 2004; Gens and Alonso 2006); Romania (UNEP/OCHA 2000); Italy (Genevois and Tecca 1993; Chandler and Tosatti 1995); Chile (Dobry and Alvarez 1967); and Sweden (Holmgren 2000; Göransson et al. 2001).
Rico et al. (2008b) documented 147 cases of dam tailings failures worldwide, triggered by 16 different factors, including management operations, seismic liquefaction, rises in the phreatic surface, slope instability, fluvial undermining, inadequate/insufficient beach or free board, piping/seepage, dam overtopping/overflowing, foundation failure, snowmelt, inadequate decant pipe construction, unusual rainfall events, insufficient efficiency of the filter drain, incorrect prediction of mine subsidence, and structural failure.
Even when a tailings dam has been designed correctly, there is always a risk of its operational failure. Despite this, even though 1) knowing how far the tailings can travel and 2) being aware of the extent of damage could help in assessing the risk associated with tailings collapses, the traditional geotechnical assessment of tailings facilities has mainly been concentrated on the stability analysis (Vick 1990), and relatively few studies have investigated the flow of tailings released following dam failure.
Many numerical dambreak analysis models have been developed to analyze the breakage of waterstorage dams. However, these models cannot be used directly to estimate the runout distance of a flowing mass in the case of tailings dam collapse, especially because of the differences in the rheological nature of the involved mass. Breaching floods are in fact usually composed of highly watersaturated, oozy sediments, which can exhibit various kinds of fluid behaviour, ranging from debris flows to muddy flood water (Rico et al. 2008a). If the outflow volume versus runout distance is considered, these floods can be grouped into two main categories: (1) floods with highviscosity spilled mine waste and (2) floods with large volumes of water inside tailings dams.
Because of this complexity, Hunter and Fell (2001) recommend not using empirical correlations for flow slides in tailings dams. Predictions based on numerical modelling are considered more appropriate, and, since debris and sediment flows exhibit similar behaviour to tailings flows, numerical models implemented for the analysis of rapid landslide runout are suitable for the modelling of tailings dynamics. The selection of the flow rheology is important for both situations, and can determine the accuracy of the method.
The above mentioned mathematical models may be divided roughly into: (i) onephase models, which describe the flow resistance behaviour of either the water and fine material slurry, or of the entire fluidsolid mixture(e.g. O’Brien et al. 1993; Pirulli 2005; McDougall 2006; Pastor et al. 2009); and (ii) twophase models, which consider both a fluid phase and a solid phase separately (e.g. Bozhinskiy and Nazarov 2000; Iverson and Denlinger 2001; Pudasaini 2012). The discussion is here limited to onephase approaches since the here presented model was designed to facilitate both a systematic comparison of singlephase flow resistance relations, such as made by Naef et al. (2006) and Rickenmann et al. (2006) for other case studies, and to identify the rheology that is able to back analyse a tailings dam failure in the most accurate way with the fewest possible changes in rheological values along the runout path.
In fact, because of the wide range of rheological behaviour that tailings flows can assume, a new version of the singlephase continuummechanics based RASH^{3D} code (Pirulli 2005), which was originally designed to study flowlike landslide runouts, has been implemented and is here described briefly. The introduced upgrade code integrates the existing rheological kernel (Frictional, Voellmy) with two new rheological laws (Bingham and Turbulent), and adds the possibility of changing the rheological parameters of a flowing mass, in a GIS (geographic information system) environment, during the propagation process.
The new version of RASH^{3D} has then been used to simulate the well documented case of a pair of tailings dams whose failure, on 19 July 1985, generated a catastrophic flood in the area of Stava, Northern Italy (Berti et al. 1988; Chandler and Tosatti 1995).
With the aim of contributing to the definition of rheological laws and their range of parameters that can be used for prediction purposes, the backanalysis of the Stava event has been carried out in an attempt to try to understand whether a single rheology is able to simulate the whole process, from triggering to deposition, without any changes in its rheological values along the runout path, or with a minimum number of changes. Numerical analyses with Turbulent, Voellmy, Frictional and Bingham rheologies have therefore been carried out by combining different sets of rheological values. The obtained results are discussed and compared with Takahashi’s (1991) 1) velocity estimates of the flowing mass attained at various points along its path, and 2) physical measurements of flow superelevations measured in channel bends.
The postfailure rheological behaviour of tailings
The liquefied material that originates from the failure of tailings has fluidlike characteristics, and the flow behaviour has been reported to be mainly laminar on relatively flat slopes and turbulent on steeper slopes (Jeyapalan et al. 1983a; Blight 1997).
Jeyapalan et al. (1983a) suggested that the Bingham plastic rheological model is a good approximation model for the flow of liquefied tailings, when the flow is laminar. Instead, the use of flood routing computer programs is recommended to model the turbulent flow of tailings. Jeyapalan et al. (1983b) applied a Bingham plastic model (TFLOW computer program) to both the Aberfan case, in South Wales (1966), and to the Gypsum Tailing Dam incident, in East Texas (1966), and laminar flow behaviour of the released tailings was pointed out. The computation results fitted well with the actual observations, even though the model was limited to one dimension, and was therefore unable to take into consideration the spreading of the flow. A turbulent flow analysis (GVFP 1978 and Fread 1978 computer programs) was instead made, through the use of the Manning resistance relation, for the Buffalo Creek Dam failure, which occurred in the USA in 1972, due to the presence of a very fluid material made up of a mixture of waste and large quantities of water. The computation results were able to represent the actual flow data rather well.
In most flow studies on tailings deposits, the flow will be laminar in nature, and the liquefied tailings will behave approximately like a Bingham plastic fluid, exhibiting both a yield stress and viscous flow characteristics, once this stress has been exceeded.
However, the entrainment of free water in the sliding mass can significantly alter the flow properties of the fluid. In laminartype flows, the entrainment of the water in the lower portion of the flow can significantly reduce the yield strength, at the base of the sliding mass, thus resulting in much longer travel distances. Large volumes of water were reported to have been stored within the impoundments of Stava (Italy), Bafokeng (South Africa), Merriespruit (South Africa) and Buffalo Creek (USA) at the time of their failure.
Furthermore, in several cases, the confinement or partial confinement of the flow in running streams and rivers resulted in the development of hyperconcentrated stream flows that travelled for great distances on relatively flat slopes. This phenomenon becomes particularly significant where the tailings enter an actively flowing watercourse. It is considered that the flows of the Stava (Italy), Buffalo Creek (USA) and Bafokeng (South Africa) events transformed into turbulent streamflows as a result of their confinement in flowing watercourses (Hunter and Fell 2001).
It can be determined whether a flow will be laminar or turbulent by using the Hanks and Pratt (1967) or the Takahashi (2007) criteria. Hanks and Pratt (1967) made a detailed analysis of a large number of published experimental data, and proposed a chart to determine the transition conditions for Bingham plastic fluids. In this chart, the critical Reynold number for transition from turbulent to laminar flow is expressed in terms of the Hedstrom number (Jeyapalan et al. 1983a).
Takahashi (2007) defined two kinds of debris flows in a wider sense: one is the quasistaticdebris flow, in which Coulomb friction stress dominates, and the other is the dynamic debris flow. In order to transmit quasistatic Coulomb friction stress, the solids concentration (C) has to be large enough to guarantee that the particles are always in contact, even though their relative position changes continuously. Bagnold (1966) stated that this condition is fulfilled when C is larger than 0.51 for natural beach sand, but this value would depend on the size of particles. Under such a densely concentrated condition, the other stresses become small, and the motion would be quasistatic. Dynamic debris flows can instead be subdivided into three further subclasses: when grain collision stress dominates, the debris flow becomes a stonytype flow, when turbulent mixing stress dominates, it becomes a turbulentmuddytype flow, and when viscous stress dominates, it becomes a viscoustype flow. Transition from one type of dynamic flow to another depends on the solid concentrations and on the relative depth of the flow, h/d (where h is the depth of the flow and d is the particle size), on the Bagnold number (ratio of the characteristic shear stresses due to grain collisions and liquid viscosity) and on the Reynolds number (ratio of the characteristic shear stresses due to grain collisions and solid friction without the solid friction coefficient) (Iverson and LaHusen 1993). When the Bagnold number is large, and the relative depth is small, a stonydebris flow occurs. When the Bagnold number and the Reynolds number are small, a viscousdebris flow occurs. When the relative depth and the Reynolds number are large, a turbulentmuddy debris flow occurs.
Theoretical aspects of RASH^{3D}
where \( {\overline{v}}_x,{\overline{v}}_y \) denote the depthaveraged flow velocities in the x and y directions (z is normal to the topography), h is the fluid depth, τ _{ zx }, τ _{ zy } are the shear resistance stresses, \( {\overline{\sigma}}_{xx},{\overline{\sigma}}_{yy} \) are the depthaveraged normal stresses, ρ is the mass density and g _{ x }, g _{ y } are the projections of the gravity vector in the x and y directions, respectively.
The governing equations in RASH^{3D} (1) are solved in an Eulerian framework, on a triangular finite element mesh, through a kinetic scheme that is based on a finite volume approach (see Audusse et al. 2000; Bristeau and Coussin 2001; MangeneyCastelnau et al. 2003).
The rheology of the material is modelled by a single term, which describes the basal shear stress that develops at the interface between the moving mass and the sliding surface. Two new rheologies have been implemented into the code, according to Jeyapalan et al. (1983a) and Takahashi (2007), in order to run numerical analyses concerning the collapse of tailing dams. These rheologies are the Bingham one, which is used in the case of a laminar flow, and the Turbulent one, which is used in the case of a turbulent flow. Furthermore, a new geographic information system (GIS) integrated function, which makes it possible to change the type of rheology and/or the rheological parameter values along the runout path, has been introduced into the improved RASH^{3D} version, to allow changes to be made to the flow characteristics during flow propagation.
Rheological kernel
where n is the Manning roughness coefficient, and the subscript i = x,y, respectively.
where C is the Chézy coefficient, which is related to the Manning coefficient (n) by C = h ^{1/6}/n.
which consists of a turbulent term, ξ (= C^{2}) that accounts for velocitydependent friction losses, and a Coulomb or basal friction term, μ (= tanδ), which is used to describe the stopping mechanism, where the basal friction angle δ is generally only a fraction of the Coulomb angle φ (McDougall and Hungr 2005), had already been included in the RASH^{3D} rheological kernel (Pirulli and Marco 2010).
where τ_{y} is the Bingham yield stress and μ_{B} is the Bingham viscosity.
The thirdorder polynomial has been solved and implemented in RASH^{3D} using the polynomial economization technique proposed by Pastor et al. (2004).
The collapse of tailings dams at Stava
The tailings that spilled out of the failed dams flowed downstream at a high speed. According to a survey that was conducted after the collapse, the total volume of sediment that had flowed out was estimated to be 88.300 m^{3} (12.000 m^{3} of fine sand and 76.300 m^{3} of silt). Moreover, after an estimation of the volumes of the supernatant water and the interstitial water, a total volume of 185.000 m^{3} of mud debris, with a volumetric solids concentration of 0.476, was calculated to have been released as a muddy debris flow (Takahashi 2007).
The villages of Stava and Tesero, located along the stream channel and at its end, respectively, were completely wiped out or buried. The flowing mass killed 268 people and completely destroyed three hotels, eight bridges, 53 homes and six industrial buildings. Nine more buildings were seriously damaged (Van Niekerk and Viljoen 2005).
After the event, a layer of dense mud, between 200 and 400 mm thick, covered an overall area of 43.5 ha over a length of 4200 m (Genevois and Tecca 1993; Van Niekerk and Viljoen 2005). At the inquest that followed the disaster, it became apparent that the tailings dams had not been subjected to any detailed stability checks for over a period of more than 20 years.

overloading, due to the additional elevation of the embankment that was under construction;

liquefaction of the slime, due to water seeping from the slope;

toe failure of the upper embankment, caused by seepage;

failure of the upper embankment, due to an incorrect installation and blockage of the drainage pipes;

insufficient separation between the pooled water and the embankment.
Furthermore, the increase in seepage water might have been affected by the heavy rainfall that had occurred two days before the collapse (Takahashi 2007), and by the fact that the embankments had been constructed using the upstream method. The upstream method is the oldest and most economic construction method, which begins with the construction of a starter dam at the downstream toe. The resulting tailings generally have a low relative density and a high water saturation degree (Vick 1990).
Definition of the flow characteristics
Although the flowing mass had an intensive destructive power, as well as a high fluidity, the Stava Creek channel itself did not suffer from much erosion or deposition (Berti et al. 1997). Takahashi (1991, 2007) stated that no erosion had occurred, because the solid fraction inside the watersediment mixture was so high (estimated to be about 0.48) that the flow could not have become denser because of erosion. In fact, different debris flow models are based on the assumption that a debris flow can erode and incorporate material from the bed until the solid concentration of the flow is as large as the equilibrium concentration for the channel gradient (e.g. Takahashi et al. 1992). This concept is also supported by Hungr et al. (2005), who stated that flows with lower volumetric sediment concentrations can be expected to be more erosive than flows with larger sediment concentrations. Finally, the laboratory experiments of Rickenmann et al. (2003) pointed out that the erosion rate initially increased as the volumetric sediment concentration increased, and then decreased as the sediment concentration increased.
Mean velocity and Manning’s roughness coefficient defined by Takahashi (1991, 2007)
Sectional Reach  MeanVelocity [m/s]  Manning’s Roughness Coefficient, n [] 

23  18  0.04 
35  23  0.04 
6′7  31  0.04 
7′8  25  0.04 
89  22  0.04 
99″  22  0.04 
9″10  18  0.04 
1010′  11  0.08 
10′12  6.2  0.13 
12′13  6.8  0.12 
Both theoretical and experimental data (Arai and Takahashi 1983, 1986; Takahashi 1991; 2007) have indicated that the velocity near the bed increases and the velocity in the upper layer approaches a uniform state for either decreasing concentrations or increasing relative depth, thus supporting Takahashi’s assumption; the velocity distribution forms approach those of a plain water flow. The dual dependence on the concentration and relative depth indicates that there is no a single value of the sediment concentration that can be considered representative of a given type of phenomenon, but this value depends on the combination of the concentration and the relative depth value, for example (Takahashi 2007).
Nevertheless, Berti et al. (1997) subdivided the Stava process into two phases: flow slide (from the tailings dams to the Stava Creek) and debris flow (along the Stava Creek valley to the confluence of the Stava Creek with the Avisio River), and evidenced, through simple scaling analysis (based on the work of Iverson and LaHusen 1993), that the friction effect had prevailed over the behaviour of the Stava debris flow.
where E_{max} is the maximum elevation of the outer edge from the surface of the undisturbed flow, m is the reciprocal of the side slope of the channel crosssection, h_{0} is the centre line depth of the undisturbed upstream flow, b is the base of the trapezoidal crosssection, v is the velocity of the undisturbed flow, and r_{0} is the centre line radius of the bend. This formula can also be applied to a rectangular channel, as indicated by Takahashi (2007).
Since a seismogram at the nearby Cavalese station (3.7 km from the collapsed tailings dams) had recorded the event, Takahashi used the available data to interpret the large vibrations as collisions of the flowing mass against particular obstacles along its path (Takahashi 1991). On the basis of records of the event, it was estimated that the whole event, from the flowing into the Stava Creek (Fig. 4, section1) to the flowing out to the Avisio River, lasted about 425 s, and that velocities of up to 37 m/s were reached. In particular, the forefront arrived at the Romano Bridge (Fig. 4, section 13) about 225 s after it had passed section 1 (Fig. 4).
The propagation rate of the forefront along the Stava Creek, according to the shock records at Cavalese, is in good agreement with the velocity values computed using the Lenau formula (1979).
Methods
Takahashi (1991) applied the kinematic wave theory to simulate the flowing process of the Stava tailings dams, but this approach requires a quasionedimensional flow, and it completely neglects the effects of extreme bends, irregular geomorphological slopes and crosssections of the channel. These important assumptions are satisfied in the central part of the Stava Creek, due to the narrow shape of the gorge, but a more complex and fully threedimensional approach is necessary to simulate the initial change in direction of the flowing mass and the final deposition at the bottom of the valley.

the propagation of the front, after the dam rupture, that overflowed onto the open terrain, which was partly covered by grass and partly by trees, before the impact with the village of Stava;

the channelized flowing of the mass along the Stava Creek, using the real irregular geomorphology of the channel;

the interaction of the flowing mass with the Romano bridge, and the final deposition at the intersection with the Avisio River.
The complex geomorphology of the terrain was reproduced accurately by downloading the 10 m digital elevation model (DEM) from the Public WEB GIS of the Trentino Geocartographic Portal of the Autonomous Province of Trento (http://www.territorio.provincia.tn.it/portal/server.pt/community/lidar/847/lidar/23954). The tailings dams were reconstructed using the available cartography and preserving the original event volume. Even though a postevent DEM was used in the analyses, it was considered representative of the 1985 morphology, since, according to different Authors (e.g. Takahashi 1991; Berti et al. 1997), the Stava Creek channel did not suffer from much erosion or deposition. On this basis, the erosional process was neglected in the numerical simulations.
Four rheologies were tested: Frictional, Voellmy, Bingham and Turbulent. Taking advantage of the GIS function that is now implemented in RASH^{3D}, analyses were also run changing the rheological values along the runout path.
The obtained results were analysed, in terms of mass distribution (cross sections, plan distribution and longitudinal profile), and compared with Takahashi’s flow velocity estimation (Table 1). Furthermore, the Δv value, that is, the difference between the RASH^{3D}computed values and Takahashi’s estimated velocity values, were also represented for each analysis to facilitate a rapid identification of the best simulations. A negative Δv value indicates an underestimation of the computed velocity with respect to the estimated one.
Results and discussion
Rheological parameter values for the numerical analyses carried out with a single combination of values along the whole runout path
Section number  n []  μ []  ξ [m/s^{2}]  δ [°]  τ_{y} [kPa]  μ_{B} [kPa⋅s] 

Tt2  0.04  
Tt3  0.02  
Vt1  0.05  300  
Vt2  0.05  2000  
Vt3  0.05  1000  
Vt4  0.03  2000  
Ft1  10  
Ft2  8  
Ft3  7  
Bt1  1  0.05  
Bt2  1  0.1  
Bt3  2  0.1 
Rheological parameter values for the numerical analyses carried out with multiple combinations of values along the runout path
Turbulent (T)  Voellmy (V)  Frictional (F)  Bingham (B)  

Sectional reach  Takahashi (1991)  Tt1  Tt4  Vt5  Vt6  Vt7  Ft4  Bt4  Bt5  
n []  n []  n []  μ []  ξ[m/s^{2}]  μ[]  ξ[m/s^{2}]  μ []  ξ[m/s^{2}]  δ [°]  τ_{y} [kPa]  μ_{B} [kPa⋅s]  τ_{y} [kPa]  μ_{B} [kPa⋅s]  
Triggering2    0.04  0.04  0.05  2000  0.05  2000  0.03  2000  10  2  0.1  2  0.1 
23  0.04  0.04  0.04  0.05  2000  0.05  2000  0.03  2000  7  1  0.1  1  0.05 
35  0.04  0.04  0.04  0.05  2000  0.05  2000  0.03  2000  7  1  0.1  1  0.05 
6′7  0.04  0.04  0.04  0.05  2000  0.05  2000  0.03  2000  7  1  0.1  1  0.05 
7′8  0.04  0.04  0.04  0.05  2000  0.05  2000  0.03  2000  7  1  0.1  1  0.05 
89  0.04  0.04  0.04  0.05  2000  0.05  2000  0.03  2000  7  1  0.1  1  0.05 
99″  0.04  0.04  0.04  0.05  2000  0.05  2000  0.03  2000  7  1  0.1  1  0.05 
9″10  0.04  0.04  0.04  0.05  2000  0.05  2000  0.03  2000  7  1  0.1  1  0.05 
1010′  0.08  0.08  0.12  0.05  300  0.05  100  0.03  100  10  1  0.1  1  0.1 
10′12  0.13  0.13  0.12  0.05  300  0.05  100  0.03  100  10  1  0.1  1  0.1 
12′13  0.12  0.12  0.12  0.05  300  0.05  100  0.03  100  10  1  0.1  1  0.1 
13Deposition    0.12  0.12  0.05  300  0.05  100  0.03  100  10  1  0.1  1  0.1 
On the basis of these results, a different rheological law was tested, still looking for the possibility of reproducing the event with the combination of parameters that requires the smallest number of changes of rheological values along the runout path. A Voellmy rheology, where friction coefficient, μ, and turbulent coefficient, ξ, have to be calibrated (see Eq. 4), was then applied. The rheological values suggested by Golder Associates Ltd (1995) were initially used with a single combination of rheological parameters for the whole propagation path (Table 2: Vt1, Vt2, Vt3 and Vt4).
Figures 5 and 6 point out that the Vt1 results simulated the flow velocity after section 10 in a rather good way, but they greatly underestimated the velocities before section 10 of the runout path. The opposite conclusion can be drawn for the results of the Vt2, Vt3 and Vt4 analyses.
As a consequence, a combination of Voellmy rheological parameters was adopted in the Vt5, Vt6 and Vt7 simulations, using a first set of values up to section 10, and a second set from section 10 onwards (Table 3). A good approximation of the mean velocity was obtained for the different sectional reaches, except for the Vt5 analysis, even though the value for sectional reach 6′7 remained critical (Fig. 5).
The possibility of simulating the event with a reduced number of changes in the rheological values along the runout path was highlighted by moving from the Turbulent (T) to the Voellmy (V) rheology. This is an important aspect, since it is difficult to foresee and define a large number of local rheological changes along the runout path when forwardanalyses are run.
Since Berti et al. (1997) stressed that friction played the most significant role in determining the behaviour of the Stava debris flow, a further set of analyses was run adopting a simple Frictional rheology, where the only parameter that needed to be calibrated was the basal friction angle (δ). As for the previous rheologies, the first analyses used a single rheological value for the whole runout path (Table 2: Ft1 with δ = 10°, Ft2 with δ = 8°, Ft3 with δ = 7°). Figure 5 shows how it was impossible to simulate the flow velocity in the whole propagation process correctly with these three analyses. Although Ft1 gave rather good results for sectional reaches after section 10, it underestimated the velocities before this section; Ft2 and Ft3 gave a better approximation of some of the velocities before section 10, but overestimated the velocities in the other sectional reaches. The Ft4 analysis was carried out in an attempt to combine different friction angle values. However, the obtained results were unsatisfactory, and underlined the difficulty in using the Frictional rheology to simulate the dynamics of this type of phenomenon, even when backanalysis is conducted. The use of a combination of frictional values in a forward analysis would be even more complex.
The Bingham rheology had never previously been applied to simulate the Stava event, on the basis of the interpretations of several Authors (see the “Tailings postfailure rheological behaviour” section). However, this rheology was adopted in the last proposed set of analyses in order to test its eventual capacity to simulate the flow velocity along the runout path.
The first analysis conducted with the Bingham rheology (see Eq. 5) was carried out with the combination of rheological values that had been defined by Pastor et al. (2004) for a gypsum tailing impoundment in East Texas, that is,τ_{y} =1 kPa and μ_{B} =0.05kPa⋅s (Table 2: Bt1). The results of this run only gave a rather good approximation of the velocity between sections 7′ and 10 of the flowing channel (Fig. 5). It can be observed, in Table 2, that the combination of rheological parameters used for the Bt2 analysis approximated the velocities in a rather good way, but only in the lower part of the propagation path (downstream from section 7), while the Bt3 results simulated the upper part of the flow path rather well, but largely underestimated the velocities in the lower part, and showed that the mass in fact stopped before reaching section 9 (Figs. 5 and 6). However, combining the rheological values of Bt2 and Bt3 in analysis Bt4 (Table 3) led to results that were even less satisfactory than those obtained for a single combination of parameters for the whole runout path (Figs. 5 and 6).
After considering the previous results, the last Bingham analysis (Bt5) was carried out with the combination of parameters indicated in Table 3. Although a large number of rheological values were considered in this single analysis, the results were not able to reproduce the complete phenomenon, which would seem to confirm that this flowing mass had different rheological behaviour.

a change in the flow direction took place when the mass reached the Stava village;

sudden increases in the channel crosssection occurred downstream from sections 1010′, and this was combined with a great resistance to flow, which was induced by the houses on the flood plain and the backwater effects of the Romano bridge.
Although the Voellmy rheology was considered with the Vt6 and Vt7 simulations, was capable of reproducing the whole Stava event dynamics with just a few changes in the rheological values along the runout path, a single couple of rheological parameters (e.g. Vt2 and Vt4) was only able to reproduce the change in the flow direction and the channelized process, but a different combination of rheological values was always necessary from section 10 onwards. This pointed out a change in the flow behaviour from sections 1010′ onwards.
The possibility of simulating the event in a satisfactory way with the Voellmy rheology, by reducing the number of changes in the rheological values, compared to the number of changes adopted by Takahashi (1991), has evidenced the combined turbulent and frictional nature of the Stava flow mass. This work has then combined the turbulent interpretation of the event given by Takahashi (1991) with the prevalent frictional process pointed out by Berti et al. (1997).
The superelevations computed with the RASH ^{3D} code for both banks mirror the height trend observed by Takahashi (1991) in a satisfactory way. However, as far as the left bank is concerned (Fig. 7a), a certain discrepancy can be observed between the computed and observed values, especially in sections 3 and 10′. As already mentioned, these sections were located where the mass initially changed flow direction, and where the channelsection suddenly increased. The numerical results pertaining to the right bank (Fig. 7b) follow the general height trend, but they indicate a certain overestimation with respect to the observed values from sections 2 to 9.
However, it should be pointed out that the positions of the crosssections analysed by Takahashi (1991), and to which reference has been made in the present paper, were obtained from a printed image. As a consequence, errors were certainly introduced by stretching and rotating the image to place it in the “right” position on the GIS map. Although this could have partially contributed to the discrepancy between the computed and measured flow velocities and the superelevations, the obtained numerical results reflect the trend of the real event.
Conclusions and further developments
This paper presents an updated version of the onephase continuummechanicsbased RASH^{3D} code, which integrates the existing rheological kernel (Frictional, Voellmy) with two new rheological laws (Bingham and Turbulent), and adds the possibility of changing the rheological properties of the flowing mass during the propagation process, using an integrated GIS function.
The upgrade of the code originated from the intent to investigate the complex rheological behaviour of tailings flows released following a dam failure, which till now has been the subject of relatively few studies, despite the serious consequences that the collapse of a tailings dam can induce.
The collapse of the Stava tailings dams was chosen as a case study, due to the amount of information that was available, and to the existence of different interpretations of the flow dynamics of this event in literature (e.g. Takahashi 1991 and Berti et al. 1997).
A large number of numerical analyses with Turbulent, Voellmy, Frictional, and Bingham rheologies have been carried out by combining different sets of rheological values, with the aim of reproducing the dynamics of the past event, in terms of flow velocity, depth and plan distribution, using the fewest possible changes in rheological values along the runout path. The idea of identifying a single rheology that would be able to simulate the whole process, from triggering to deposition, without changing its values along the runout path or with the fewest number of changes, could in fact contribute to obtaining rheological indications that could be used for forwardanalyses.
Takahashi (1991) interpreted the Stava flow as turbulent, Berti et al. (1997) considered the the flow as being mainly frictional, but all the literature on this flow agree on the inapplicability of the Bingham rheology to this case.
The results obtained from the present analyses have indicated that the Voellmy rheology, which combines a frictional and a turbulent term, is the most appropriate to simulate the Stava event, with the simplest combination of rheological values. The Turbulent rheology, suggested by Takahashi (1991), required Manning’s value to be changed many times along the runout path. The same can be stated for the friction angle of the Frictional rheology. In the case of the Bingham rheology, the combination of a large number of values did not lead to satisfactory results, thus confirming the inapplicability of this rheology to the Stava event.
The best results of the Voellmy rheology have been obtained from test Tt6, in terms of both the mean velocity in the sectional reaches, and the superelevation on the left and right banks of the whole runout path.
In reality, the complex process of the collapse of tailings dams involves different mechanisms, any of which may dominate at different locations. However, considering the current limited understanding of these mechanisms, it has been shown that simplification of the phenomenon, by means of an appropriate rheological law and rheological parameters, should not preclude the successful simulation of the bulk characteristics of a real event.
Finally, it can be stated that the new model significantly expands the possibility of simulating the dynamic behaviour of flowlike landslide events of different natures. With continued backanalysis of real events and investigations on the correlation between the characteristics of the event and the most suitable rheology, important indications can be obtained on the rheological choices necessary to make forwardanalyses.
Further developments of this research will certainly include the use of more sophisticated methods (e.g. twophases models). However, the generalized use of more complex numerical models for the back and forwardanalyses of real events still remains limited, since information on individual sites and the characteristics of events are usually limited.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The Authors wish to thank the Foundation Stava 1985 for providing some of the data necessary for a better comprehension of the here analysed case study.
Authors’ contributions
MP carried out analysis and interpretation of data and designed drafting and conception of the study. MB collected data. MM created figures. CS helped to draft the manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The Authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Arai, M., and T. Takahashi. 1983. A method for measuring velocity profiles in mud flows. In Proc. 20th Cong. IAHR, vol. 3, 279–286.Google Scholar
 Arai, M., and T. Takahashi. 1986. The mechanics of mud flow. In Proc. JSCE, vol. 375/II–6, 69–77.Google Scholar
 Audusse, E., M.O. Bristeau, and B. Perthame. 2000. Kinetic schemes for SaintVenant equations with source terms on unstructured grids. France: INRIA Rep. 3989, Natl. Inst. for Res. in Comput. Sci. and Control, Le Chesnay.Google Scholar
 AyalaCarcedo, F.J. 2004. La rotura de la balsa de residuos mineros de Aznalcóllar (España) de 1998 y el desastre ecológico consecuente del rio Guadiamar: causas, efectos y lecciones. Boletín Geológico y Minero 115: 711–738.Google Scholar
 Bagnold, R.A. 1966. The shearing and dilatation for dry sand and ‘singing’ mechanism. Proceedings. Royal Society of London A225: 49–63.Google Scholar
 Berti, G., F. Villa, D. Dovera, R. Genevois, and J. Grauns. 1988. The disaster of Stava. In Proc. Spec. Conf. on Hydraulic Fill Structures, 492–509. New York: ASCE SP21.Google Scholar
 Berti, M., R. Genevois, and P.R. Tecca. 1997. The 1985 flow slide and debris flow at Stava (Italy). In 1st Internat. Conf. on “Debris Flow Hazard Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment”, 79 August 1997, San Francisco (Cal.), ed. Chen ChengIung, 309–321. New York: Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs.Google Scholar
 Blight, G. 1997. Destructive mudflows as a consequence of tailings dyke failures. Geotechnical Engineering, Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers 125: 9–18.Google Scholar
 Blight, G.E., M.J. Robinson, and J.A.C. Diering. 1981. The flow of slurry from a breached tailing dam. Journal of South African Institute Mining and Metallurgy 81: 1–8.Google Scholar
 Bozhinskiy, A.N., and A.N. Nazarov. 2000. Twophase model of debris flow. In 2nd Int. Conf. on DebrisFlow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, 1618 August 2000, Taipei, Taiwan, ed. G.F. Wieczorek and N.D. Naeser, 263–269. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
 Bristeau, M.O., and B. Coussin. 2001. Boundary conditions for the shallow water equations solved by kinetic schemes. France: INRIA Rep. 4282, Natl. Inst. for Res. in Comput. Sci. and Control, Le Chesnay.Google Scholar
 Chandler, R.L., and G. Tosatti. 1995. The Stava tailings dams failure, Italy, July 1985. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering 133: 67–79.Google Scholar
 Costa, J.E. 1997. Hydraulic modeling for Lahar hazards at Cascades Volcanoes. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience III(1): 21–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Dobry, R., and L. Alvarez. 1967. Seismic failures of Chilean tailings dams. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 94: 237–260.Google Scholar
 Fread, D.L. 1978. The NWS dambreak flood forecasting model. Report from Office of Hydrogy, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Md., September 1978.Google Scholar
 Genevois, R., and P.R. Tecca. 1993. The tailings dams of Stava (northern Italy): an analysis of the disaster. In Environmental Management Geowater and Engineering Aspects, ed. R.N. Chowdhury and M. Sivakumar, 23–36. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
 Gens, A., and E.E. Alonso. 2006. Aznalcóllar dam failure. Part 2: Stability conditions and failure mechanism. Geotechnique 56: 185–201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Golder Associates Ltd (1995). Mined rock and overburden piles: runout characteristics of debris from dump failures in mountainous terrain. Stage 2: analysis, modelling and prediction. Interim Report British Columbia Mine Waste Rock Pile Research Comittee and Canadian Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology. Prepared in association with O. Hungr Geotechnical Research Inc. Publisher: British Columbia Mine Waste Rock Pile Research Committee. http://www.worldcat.org/title/minedrockandoverburdenpilesstage2analysismodellingandpredictioninterimreportsubmittedtodepartmentofsupplyandservicesiepublicworksandgovernmentservicescanadapreparedbygolderassociatesltdinassociationwithohungr/oclc/35927829.
 Göransson, T., A. Benckert, M. Lindvall, and R. Ritzén. 2001. Dam failure at the Aitik mine: investigations, conclusions and measures taken. In Proceedings of Securing the Future. Skellefteå: International Conference on Mining and the Environment.Google Scholar
 GVFP. 1978. Gradually varied flow profile program. Davis: Hydrogeological Engineering Center, U.S. Army Engineers.Google Scholar
 Hanks, R.W., and D.R. Pratt. 1967. On the flow of Bingham plastic slurries in pipes and between parallel plates. Journal of Society of Petroleum Engineers 7: 342–346.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Holmgren, R. 2000. Experiences from the tailing dam failure at the boliden Mine Aitik and the legal consequences. Sweden: Internal Report, County Administration of Norrbotten.Google Scholar
 Hungr, O., S. McDougall, and M. Bovis. 2005. Entrainment of material by debris flows. In Debrisflow hazards and related phenomena, ed. M. Jakob and O. Hungr, 135–158. Berlin: Springer.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Hungr, O., and S. McDougall. 2009. Two numerical models for landslide dynamic analysis. Computers & Geosciences 35(5): 978–992.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Hunter, G., and R. Fell. 2001. “Rapid” failure of soils slopes. UNICIV Report No. R400, June 2001.Google Scholar
 ISMES. 1986. Indagini geotecniche di laboratorio su materiali provenienti dai bacini Prestavel in località Stava  Tesero. Technical Report for the Team of Experts of the Trento Court, 5 Vols.Google Scholar
 Iverson, R.M., and R.P. Denlinger. 2001. Flow of variably fluidized granularmasses across threedimensional terrain 1. Coulomb mixture theory. Journal of Geophysical Research 106(B1): 537–552.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Iverson, R.M., and R.G. LaHusen. 1993. Friction in debris flows: inferences from largescale flume experiments. In Proceedings Conference on Hydraulic Engineering, ed. H.W. Shen, S.T. Su, and F. Wen, 1604–1069. San Francisco: ASCE.Google Scholar
 Jeyapalan, J.K., J.M. Duncan, and H.B. Seed. 1983a. Analyses of flow failures of mine tailings dams. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE 109(2): 150–171.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Jeyapalan, J.K., J.M. Duncan, and H.B. Seed. 1983b. Investigation of flow failures of tailings dams. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE 109(2): 172–189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Jin, M., and D.L. Fread. 1999. 1D modeling of mud/debris unsteady flows. Journal of Hydrological Engineering 125(8): 827–834.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kossoff, D., W.E. Dubbin, A. Alfredsson, S.J. Edwards, M.G. Macklin, and K.A. HudsonEdwards. 2014. Mine tailing dams: characteristics, failure, environmental impact, and remediation. Applied Geochemistry 51: 229–245.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Lenau, C.W. 1979. Super critical flow in bends of trapezoidal section. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 105: 43–54.Google Scholar
 Luino, F., and J.V. De Graff. 2012. The Stava mudflow of 19 July 1985 (Northern Italy): a disaster that effective regulation might have prevented. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 12: 1029–1044.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 MangeneyCastelnau, A., J.P. Vilotte, M.O. Bristeau, B. Perthame, F. Bouchut, C. Simeoni, and S. Yernini. 2003. Numerical modelling of debris avalanche based on SaintVenant equations using a kinetic scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research 108(B11): 1–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 McDougall, S. 2006. A new continuum dynamic model for the analysis of extremely rapid landslide motion across complex 3D terrain. Ph.D. thesis. Canada: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
 McDougall, S., and O. Hungr. 2005. Dynamic modelling of entrainment in rapid landslides. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 42(5): 1437–1448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Naef, D., D. Rickenmann, P. Rutschmann, and B. McArdell. 2006. Comparison of flow resistance relations for debris flows using a onedimensional finite element simulation model. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 6: 155–165.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 O’Brien, J.S., P.Y. Julien, and W.T. Fullerton. 1993. Twodimensional water flood and mud flow simulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 119(2): 244–261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Pastor, M., B. Haddad, G. Sorbino, S. Cuomo, and V. Drempetic. 2009. A depth integrated coupled SPH model for flowlike landslides and related phenomena. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 33(2): 143–172.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Pastor, M., M. Quecedo, E. Gonzalez, M.I. Herreros, J.A. Fernandez Merodo, and P. Mira. 2004. Simple approximation to bottom friction for Bingham fluid depth integrated models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 130(2): 149–155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Pirulli, M., and F. Marco. 2010. Description and numerical modelling of the October 2000 Nora debris flow, Northwestern Italian Alps. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 47: 135–146.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Pirulli, M. 2005. Numerical modelling of landslide runout: A continuum mechanics approach. Ph.D. thesis. Italy: Politecnico di Torino.Google Scholar
 Pudasaini, S.P. 2012. A general twophase debris flow model. Journal of Geophysical Research 117(F03010): 1–28.Google Scholar
 Rickenmann, D., D. Weber, and B. Stepanov. 2003. Erosion by debris flows in field and laboratory experiments. In Debrisflow hazards mitigations: mechanics, prediction, and assessment, ed. D. Rickenmann and C. Chen, 883–894. Rotterdam: Millpress.Google Scholar
 Rickenmann, D., D. Laigle, B. McArdell, and J. Hubl. 2006. Comparison of 2D debrisflow simulation models with field events. Computational Geosciences 10: 241–264.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Rico, M., G. Benito, A.R. Salgueiro, A. DiezHerrero, and H.G. Pereira. 2008a. Reported tailings dam failures: a review of the European incidents in the worldwide context. Journal of Hazardous Material 152: 846–852.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Rico, M., G. Benito, and A. DíezHerrero. 2008b. Floods from tailings dam failures. Journal of Hazardous Materials 154: 79–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Takahashi, T. 1991. Debris flows. Rotterdam: IAHR Monograph, Balkema.Google Scholar
 Takahashi, T., H. Nakagawa, T. Harada, and Y. Yamashiki. 1992. Routing debris flows with particle segregation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 118(11): 1490–1507.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Takahashi, T. 2007. Debris flows: Mechanics, prediction and countermeasures. Rotterdam: Monograph, Balkema.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 UNEP/OCHA. 2000. Cyanide spill at Baia Mare, Romania. UNEP/OCHA Assessment Mission, UNEP/Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, OCHA.Google Scholar
 Van Niekerk, H.J., and M.J. Viljoen. 2005. Causes and consequences of the Merriespruit and other tailingsdam failures. Land Degradation & Development 16: 201–212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Vick, S.G. 1996. Failure of the Omai talings dam. Geotechnical News September, 34–40.Google Scholar
 Vick, S.G. 1990. Planning, design, and analysis of tailings dams. Vancouver: BiTech Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar